Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
880b8a6b3f Record the negative result: judges named a winner on 29 of 30 pure-noise pairs, so the earlier cheap-arm advantage is indistinguishable from generation randomness 2026-09-02 22:23:34 +03:00
56ec3bda44 Fix my own timing claim: 21:49 was the task file's creation, not the result, so the addendum was written blind mid-panel rather than after the numbers 2026-09-02 22:16:12 +03:00
947ce4b503 Correct the addendum's own claim: it was written blind but ten minutes after the panel wrote its result, so it is not a pre-registration and must not be counted as one 2026-09-02 22:14:38 +03:00
394e2bd536 Add the null-guard resolution addendum before any judging numbers arrive: at ten pairs the p-threshold catches only 9:1, so tie-rate comparison against battle pairs becomes the diagnostic 2026-09-02 21:59:40 +03:00
f8d4e40d78 Freeze the second blind key before judging: thirty battle pairs on manifest-stitched drafts plus ten low-against-low active nulls 2026-09-02 21:48:28 +03:00
480684fce1 Freeze the second pre-registration before any paid call: manifest-authoritative unit stitching, unit-level permutation test, two primary lenses and low-against-low active nulls 2026-09-02 21:31:52 +03:00
d8c9ec280d Record the blind-read result after adversarial attack, with seven errata naming the truncated draft that left the accuracy lens without a reference on a third of the text 2026-09-02 20:32:11 +03:00
be5af14d3f Give the blind pairs neutral aliases so the filename cannot tell a judge which arm or control it is reading 2026-09-02 19:40:38 +03:00
dd23f452d5 Freeze the blind-read pre-registration and its key before any judging, with null controls that void the instrument if judges pick winners on identical texts 2026-09-02 19:38:52 +03:00