33 lines
No EOL
23 KiB
JSON
Executable file
33 lines
No EOL
23 KiB
JSON
Executable file
{
|
||
"tag": "ehen-dp-locate-w1",
|
||
"model": "deepseek-v4-pro",
|
||
"model_returned": "deepseek-v4-pro",
|
||
"nothink": false,
|
||
"extra_body": {},
|
||
"effort_param": null,
|
||
"reasoning_tokens": 4419,
|
||
"finish": "stop",
|
||
"ts": "2026-08-05T15:32:44Z",
|
||
"prompt_tokens": 1220,
|
||
"cached_tokens": 0,
|
||
"completion_tokens": 4423,
|
||
"cost_usd": 0.004379,
|
||
"latency_s": 72.3,
|
||
"content": "NO_CHANGE",
|
||
"reasoning_chars": 14900,
|
||
"reasoning": "We are asked to find problem spots in the draft translation against the source text and glossary. We need to look for fidelity, terms, style issues. No rewriting. Output a numbered list of defects, or NO_CHANGE if none.\n\nFirst, recall the glossary:\n- 空窍 → «Aperture» (used correctly? Draft: \"Aperture\" in one place, check consistency)\n- 真元 → «primeval essence» (draft uses \"primeval essence\" correctly)\n- 元石 → «primeval stone» (draft uses \"primeval stones\" consistently)\n- 元海 → «sea of primeval essence» (draft uses \"sea of primeval essence\" correctly)\n- 蛊师 → «Gu Master» (draft uses \"Gu Masters\" correctly)\n- 月光蛊 → «Moonlight Gu» (draft uses \"Moonlight Gu\" correctly)\n\nNow, examine fidelity: source phrases and their renderings.\n\nSource: \"四成四的体积\" — \"four-tenths four-tenths of the volume\", i.e., 44%? Wait: 成 means tenths. So 四成四 = 4.4 tenths = 44%? Actually, four-tenths (40%) plus four-tenths of a tenth? No: in Chinese, 成 is one-tenth. So 四成四 = 4 tenths and 4, which is 44%? That would be 4.4 成? Actually, 四成四 means 4.4 tenths, i.e., 44% (since 1 成 = 10%). So \"44%\" is correct. Draft: \"44%\" — fine.\n\nBut then later: \"八分\" — 分 is often one-tenth as well? Source: \"他每小时能补充八分真元。六个小时,就能恢复四成八分的真元总量\" — \"eight fen of primeval essence per hour. In six hours, he can recover four cheng eight fen total primeval essence.\" 八分 = 0.8 tenths? Wait: 分 can be one-tenth of a 成? Actually, in traditional measurement, 1 成 = 10 分? But here, 分 is likely a fraction: 八分 = 8/10? That would be 0.8? But the context: Fang Zheng with A-grade aptitude replenishes 八分 every hour, and in six hours recovers 四成八分 = 4 成 8 分. If 成 is tenths, then 四成八分 = 4.8 tenths = 48% total. But then 八分 = 0.8 tenths? That would be 0.8 tenths per hour, which is 0.08 per hour, times 6 = 0.48, matching 48%. So 八分 = 0.8 成? Actually, 分 here is indeed a tenth of a 成? Usually 1 成 = 10 分. So 八分 = 8/10 of a 成 = 0.8 成. So 0.8 tenths per hour. Draft says: \"he could replenish 0.8 tenths of primeval essence every hour.\" That is correct: 0.8 tenths. Then \"48%\" matches 四成八分. So that's fine.\n\nBut check: source says \"他每小时能补充八分真元。六个小时,就能恢复四成八分的真元总量\" — Draft: \"he could replenish 0.8 tenths of primeval essence every hour. In six hours, he could recover 48% of his total primeval essence\" — that's faithful. Percentages are consistent.\n\nNow, the phrase \"四成四的体积\" — draft \"44% of its volume.\" That's okay.\n\nNow, look for other issues: \"月光蛊\" is \"Moonlight Gu\" consistently. \"空窍\" via \"Aperture\" appears in \"within his Aperture.\" Good.\n\nCheck \"元海\" — \"sea of primeval essence\" — correct.\n\nCheck \"蛊师\" — \"Gu Master\" — correct.\n\nNow, any style issues? \"absorb the natural primeval force within primeval stones.\" The source: \"汲取元石中的自然元力。\" 汲取 = absorb, 元石中的自然元力 = natural primeval force within primeval stones. Draft: \"absorb the natural primeval force within primeval stones.\" Looks fine.\n\n\"condensing natural primeval essence\" — source: \"凝聚着天然真元\" — condensing natural primeval essence. Good.\n\nFang Yuan \"held a primeval stone in his hand\" — source: \"方源手握元石\" — yes.\n\n\"drawing out its natural primeval essence in an endless stream and channeling it into the sea of primeval essence within his Aperture.\" Source: \"从里面源源不断地汲取出天然真元,汇入到自己的空窍元海之中。\" 源源不断地 = in an endless stream, 汲取 = draw out, 天然真元 = natural primeval essence, 汇入 = channel into, 空窍元海 = sea of primeval essence within his Aperture. Draft: \"drawing out its natural primeval essence in an endless stream and channeling it into the sea of primeval essence within his Aperture.\" Good.\n\n\"delicate luster\" — source: \"细腻光华\" — delicate luster? 细腻 = fine, smooth, delicate; 光华 = luster. Okay.\n\n\"slowly dimmed\" — 慢慢地暗淡下去 — slowly dimmed. Yes.\n\n\"while the water level of Fang Yuan's sea of primeval essence rose visibly, climbing without cease.\" Source: \"方源的元海水位却以肉眼可见的速度,不断攀升。\" 以肉眼可见的速度 = at a speed visible to the naked eye -> visibly. 不断攀升 = continuously climbing. \"climbing without cease\" is a bit literary but fine.\n\n\"After roughly half an hour\" — 大约半个小时之后 — after roughly half an hour. Correct.\n\n\"the sea of primeval essence recovered to 44% of its volume.\" Source: \"元海重新恢复到四成四的体积。\" 四成四的体积 = 44% volume. Draft: \"44% of its volume.\" Good.\n\n\"At this point, the rising trend of the water's surface came to an abrupt halt.\" Source: \"到了这程度,海面增高的趋势,就戛然而止。\" 海面增高的趋势 = the rising trend of the sea's surface. Draft: \"the rising trend of the water's surface.\" Okay.\n\n\"Though there was still space within his Aperture, Fang Yuan could no longer store any more primeval essence.\" Source: \"虽然空窍中还有空间,但是方源却再也存储不了更多真元。\" Draft: \"Though there was still space within his Aperture, Fang Yuan could no longer store any more primeval essence.\" Good.\n\n\"This was the limitation of his C-grade aptitude.\" Source: \"这就是他丙等资质的局限了。\" 丙等 = C-grade. Draft \"C-grade\" is correct.\n\n\"From this, the crucial role of cultivation aptitude was made evident.\" Source: \"由此,就可体现出修行资质的重要作用了。\" Draft: \"From this, the crucial role of cultivation aptitude was made evident.\" Fine. Maybe \"was evident\" but it's okay.\n\n\"The higher one's aptitude, the more primeval essence could be stored within the Aperture, and the faster natural recovery of primeval essence would be.\" Source: \"资质越高,空窍中存储的真元就越多,并且真元自然恢复的速度也越快。\" The draft uses \"the more primeval essence could be stored\" which is passive, but fine. However, the phrase \"natural recovery of primeval essence\" — the source says \"真元自然恢复的速度\" — natural recovery speed of primeval essence. Draft says \"the faster natural recovery of primeval essence would be.\" That's okay.\n\nNow, a potential issue: \"For Fang Yuan, refining the Gu worm and consolidating his progress required absorbing primeval stones\" — source: \"对于方源来讲,要炼化蛊虫,巩固成果,必须得吸收元石\" — \"炼化蛊虫\" is refining the Gu worm, \"巩固成果\" consolidating his gains/progress. Draft: \"refining the Gu worm and consolidating his progress\" Good.\n\n\"because the speed at which his primeval essence naturally recovered could not match the speed at which the Moonlight Gu expelled primeval essence.\" Source: \"因为他真元自然恢复的速度,比不上月光蛊驱逐真元的速度。\" Draft: \"because the speed at which his primeval essence naturally recovered could not match the speed at which the Moonlight Gu expelled primeval essence.\" Fine.\n\nNow, Fang Zheng part: \"But for Fang Zheng, who had A-grade aptitude, he could replenish 0.8 tenths of primeval essence every hour.\" Source: \"但是对于甲等资质的方正来讲,他每小时能补充八分真元。\" 甲等 = A-grade. 八分 = 8/10 of a 成 = 0.8 tenths. Draft says \"0.8 tenths\". But careful: 0.8 tenths is equivalent to 0.08 as a proportion of total? Actually, 0.8 tenths means 0.8 of a tenth, which is 0.08. So saying \"0.8 tenths\" might be confusing; but it is a literal translation of 八分. The source uses 成 and 分 consistently. The problem is that \"0.8 tenths\" is technically 0.08 of the whole, but might be read as 0.8 = 80%? But it says \"0.8 tenths\", which is clear: eight-tenths of one-tenth? Actually, \"0.8 tenths\" is just 0.08 if a tenth is 0.1. That's correct mathematically. However, later they say \"48% of his total primeval essence\", which matches 四成八分 (4.8 tenths = 48%). So the 0.8 tenths per hour times 6 hours gives 4.8 tenths = 48%. So that's consistent. No defect there.\n\nBut note: The draft uses \"0.8 tenths\" — while it's accurate, it might be considered a calque from Chinese fractions. But we're not asked to change style unless it's awkward. It's acceptable.\n\nNow, \"He did not even need external aid like primeval stones.\" Source: \"他甚至不需要元石这样的外力帮助\" — external aid like primeval stones. Draft says \"He did not even need external aid like primeval stones.\" Good.\n\n\"He could simply keep refining, resting a few times in between, and after a few days, he would successfully refine the Moonlight Gu.\" Source: \"就这样一直炼化,期间休息几次,过个几天,就能将月光蛊成功炼化。\" Draft: \"He could simply keep refining, resting a few times in between, and after a few days, he would successfully refine the Moonlight Gu.\" Fine.\n\n\"Therefore, Fang Yuan knew from the very beginning that in this assessment of refining the Moonlight Gu, he had no chance whatsoever of taking first place. This had nothing to do with strength—aptitude was the primary determining factor here.\" Source: \"所以,方源从一开始就知道,在这场炼化月光蛊的考核中,自己根本就没可能夺得第一。这无关实力,而是资质才是此中的第一因素。\" 夺得第一 = take first place. Draft: \"taking first place.\" Good. \"这无关实力,而是资质才是此中的第一因素\" — This had nothing to do with strength; aptitude was the primary factor here. Draft: \"This had nothing to do with strength—aptitude was the primary determining factor here.\" The Chinese says \"资质才是此中的第一因素\" — aptitude was the first factor in this. The draft adds \"determining\" which is fine, no distortion.\n\nNow, any term issues: \"true essence\"? The source uses 真元, we use \"primeval essence\". All renderings use \"primeval essence\". The glossary mandates primeval essence. Draft uses \"primeval essence\" consistently. Good.\n\nOne possible issue: In the first sentence, source says \"第二种方法,就是汲取元石中的自然元力。\" Draft: \"The second method was to absorb the natural primeval force within primeval stones.\" \"自然元力\" is \"natural primeval force\". Glossary doesn't have it, but it's consistent with primeval essence? Force vs essence? But source: 元力, which might be different from 真元. However, the text says \"自然元力\" and then \"真元\" later. The glossary only gives 真元 → «primeval essence». So we should check: The source says \"元石是大自然的瑰宝,凝聚着天然真元\" — primeval stones condense natural primeval essence. Then the draft says \"absorb the natural primeval force\" for 自然元力. Is 元力 the same as 真元? Likely, they are related but maybe 元力 is raw natural energy, but in this context it's okay to use \"primeval force\"? But the glossary might not specify. The problem is if the draft used \"primeval force\" where the glossary expects \"primeval essence\"? 真元 is primeval essence. 元力 might be \"primeval force\". The term \"primeval force\" appears only in that first sentence. This might be a fidelity issue: the source says 自然元力, draft says \"natural primeval force\". Could it be considered a deviation? The glossary only covers 真元. So it's not a direct term violation. But 元力 is not listed. So probably fine.\n\nBut then later, \"absorbing primeval stones\" — no issue.\n\nCheck: \"consolidating his progress\" — source: \"巩固成果\" — \"consolidating his progress\" is good.\n\nAre there any numbers or ranks misrendered? C-grade, 44%, 0.8 tenths, 48%, 30% — all match: 三成 = 30%. Source says \"月光蛊在同样的六个小时内,只能驱逐三成真元。\" Draft says \"could only expel 30% of it\". Correct.\n\nNow, the phrase \"climbing without cease\" — \"不断攀升\" is \"continuously climbing\", \"climbing without cease\" is a bit poetic but fine.\n\nNow, is there any calque of gestures or idioms? No gestures.\n\nNow, check for unit: 半个小时 — half an hour, correct.\n\nNow, any unnatural constructions? \"The second method was to absorb the natural primeval force within primeval stones.\" Could be \"The second method was absorbing the natural primeval force in primeval stones.\" But it's not a defect.\n\nBut one potential defect: \"recovered to 44% of its volume.\" The source is \"四成四的体积\" — 44% of volume. But the original might have meant \"four-tenths and four percent\"? Actually, 四成四 = 4.4 tenths = 44%. So \"44%\" is correct. The draft uses \"44%\" not \"four-tenths four\". So not a defect.\n\nNow, I see one possible subtle distortion: In the draft: \"refining the Gu worm and consolidating his progress required absorbing primeval stones\" — the source \"必须得吸收元石\" means \"must absorb primeval stones\". Draft says \"required absorbing primeval stones\" — same meaning.\n\nNow, in the Fang Zheng part, draft: \"But for Fang Zheng, who had A-grade aptitude, he could replenish 0.8 tenths of primeval essence every hour.\" The phrase \"0.8 tenths\" might be a bit ambiguous if a reader thinks 0.8 out of 10, but it's 0.8 of a tenth. But that is the correct fraction. However, note: 八分 here might also be read as 8 parts out of a certain base. The text earlier used 成 for tenths. So 分 here is indeed a tenth of a 成. The draft says \"0.8 tenths\" — that is 0.8 of a tenth. It might be better to say \"eight-tenths of a tenth\" but \"0.8 tenths\" is acceptable. No defect.\n\nBut there is another point: \"could only expel 30% of it over the same six hours.\" The source says \"只能驱逐三成真元\" — expel 30% of primeval essence. The draft says \"30% of it\" with \"it\" referring to total primeval essence? The context: \"In six hours, he could recover 48% of his total primeval essence, whereas the Moonlight Gu could only expel 30% of it over the same six hours.\" That's fine.\n\nNow, check for any missing or added meaning atoms. Source last sentence: \"这无关实力,而是资质才是此中的第一因素。\" Draft: \"This had nothing to do with strength—aptitude was the primary determining factor here.\" The addition of \"determining\" is minor and doesn't distort. But \"第一因素\" means \"first factor\", primary factor. So fine.\n\nNow, concerning glossary: The draft uses \"Aperture\" with a capital A. The glossary has 空窍 → Aperture. So okay. \"Moonlight Gu\" capitalised as a proper name? Yes, Gu is capitalised? The glossary says «Moonlight Gu». So that's correct.\n\nNow, I'll look for any off-style: \"sea of primeval essence within his Aperture\" — that's a bit wordy but fine.\n\nOne possible defect: The draft says \"the sea of primeval essence recovered to 44% of its volume.\" The source: \"元海重新恢复到四成四的体积。\" It says the sea recovered to 44% volume, meaning its level. But draft says \"44% of its volume.\" That's a direct translation. No issue.\n\nNow, I think there are no obvious fidelity distortions, term violations, or calques that are problematic. So the answer might be NO_CHANGE.\n\nBut wait, I recall the problem spot: \"he could replenish 0.8 tenths of primeval essence every hour.\" The fraction \"0.8 tenths\" is technically correct, but it might be considered a calque from Chinese that could be confusing. However, the instruction says: \"Do NOT count as defects the places that are correct and read normally.\" Does \"0.8 tenths\" read normally? To many English readers, \"0.8 tenths\" might be mistaken for 0.8 out of 10, i.e., 8%, but it's actually 0.08 of the total, which is 8%? Wait, let's calculate: if 八成 is 80%, then 八分 is 8%? Actually, if 成 is tenths, then 四成四 = 44%, so 成 is 10%. Then 分 as a tenth of a 成 would be 1%. So 八分 = 8%? But then 0.8 tenths? 0.8 tenths of what? If 1 成 = 10%, then 1 分 = 1%? But Chinese says 八分, which is 8 分, that would be 8% per hour. In six hours 48% = 四成八分 (4 成 8 分) = 48%. So 八分 is 8%, not 0.8 tenths (that would be 0.8%? No, 0.8 tenths as 0.8 of a tenth (10%) is 8%. Because a tenth is 10%, 0.8 tenths = 8%. So that is correct: 0.8 tenths = 8%. So the draft says \"0.8 tenths\" meaning 8% of total. That's acceptable, though \"0.8 tenths\" is a bit clunky. But it's not a distortion. The alternative would be \"8% of his total primeval essence per hour\"? Source is 八分, not 八成, so 八分 is 8%, not 80%. Draft said 0.8 tenths, which is 8%. So it's accurate. So no defect.\n\nNow, check the phrase \"the water level ... rising visibly, climbing without cease.\" \"climbing without cease\" might be slightly archaic, but not a defect.\n\nGiven the instructions, I find no problem spots. So output NO_CHANGE.",
|
||
"messages": [
|
||
{
|
||
"role": "system",
|
||
"content": "You are a literary editor of a fiction translation into English. You are given the SOURCE text and its draft translation.\nBook genre: webnovel. Audience: adult webnovel readers. Book: «蛊真人».\n\nYour task is ONLY TO FIND the problem spots in the draft. Do not fix or rewrite anything.\n\nWhat to look for, in order of importance:\n- FIDELITY: distortions of meaning against the source (language «zh») — inverted polarity, wrong numbers and ranks, lost or added meaning atoms, misread realia, calqued gestures and idioms (e.g. a bow as \"struck his head\").\n- TERMS: proper names, terms and realia STRICTLY per the supplied glossary (if attached).\n- STYLE: calques from «zh», officialese, unnatural constructions, broken word forms. BUT a repetition standing in the same (parallel) positions of the source is an authorial refrain, not a defect.\n- Units and devices (common to zh→en): MEASURES (时辰 = 2 hours; the fraction 成 means tenths: 六成六 = 66%); POEMS and titles of classics — by meaning.\n\nDo NOT count as defects the places that are correct and read normally. An empty list is a full answer.\n\nRESPONSE FORMAT: a numbered list, one line per defect, in the form\nN. <first 5-8 words of the problem spot> — <what the defect is, up to 10 words>\nIf there are no defects, output exactly one line: NO_CHANGE\nNothing except this list may appear in the response."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"role": "system",
|
||
"content": "CANONICAL RENDERINGS of names and terms (in the draft, the source term on the left MUST be rendered exactly by the form on the right — bring any divergence to it, inflecting by context; do not introduce other variants and do not change anything else):\n- 空窍 → «Aperture»\n- 真元 → «primeval essence»\n- 元石 → «primeval stone»\n- 元海 → «sea of primeval essence»\n- 蛊师 → «Gu Master»\n- 月光蛊 → «Moonlight Gu»"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"role": "user",
|
||
"content": "Source text (language «zh»):\n\n 第二种方法,就是汲取元石中的自然元力。\n 元石是大自然的瑰宝,凝聚着天然真元,可以被蛊师吸收。\n 方源手握元石,从里面源源不断地汲取出天然真元,汇入到自己的空窍元海之中。\n 元石表面的细腻光华,慢慢地暗淡下去,方源的元海水位却以肉眼可见的速度,不断攀升。\n 大约半个小时之后,元海重新恢复到四成四的体积。到了这程度,海面增高的趋势,就戛然而止。虽然空窍中还有空间,但是方源却再也存储不了更多真元。这就是他丙等资质的局限了。\n 由此,就可体现出修行资质的重要作用了。\n 资质越高,空窍中存储的真元就越多,并且真元自然恢复的速度也越快。\n 对于方源来讲,要炼化蛊虫,巩固成果,必须得吸收元石,因为他真元自然恢复的速度,比不上月光蛊驱逐真元的速度。\n 但是对于甲等资质的方正来讲,他每小时能补充八分真元。六个小时,就能恢复四成八分的真元总量,而月光蛊在同样的六个小时内,只能驱逐三成真元。\n 他甚至不需要元石这样的外力帮助,就这样一直炼化,期间休息几次,过个几天,就能将月光蛊成功炼化。\n 所以,方源从一开始就知道,在这场炼化月光蛊的考核中,自己根本就没可能夺得第一。这无关实力,而是资质才是此中的第一因素。\n\n\nDraft translation to edit:\n\nThe second method was to absorb the natural primeval force within primeval stones.\n\nPrimeval stones were treasures of nature, condensing natural primeval essence that Gu Masters could absorb. Fang Yuan held a primeval stone in his hand, drawing out its natural primeval essence in an endless stream and channeling it into the sea of primeval essence within his Aperture.\n\nThe delicate luster on the surface of the primeval stone slowly dimmed, while the water level of Fang Yuan's sea of primeval essence rose visibly, climbing without cease. After roughly half an hour, the sea of primeval essence recovered to 44% of its volume. At this point, the rising trend of the water's surface came to an abrupt halt. Though there was still space within his Aperture, Fang Yuan could no longer store any more primeval essence. This was the limitation of his C-grade aptitude.\n\nFrom this, the crucial role of cultivation aptitude was made evident.\n\nThe higher one's aptitude, the more primeval essence could be stored within the Aperture, and the faster natural recovery of primeval essence would be.\n\nFor Fang Yuan, refining the Gu worm and consolidating his progress required absorbing primeval stones, because the speed at which his primeval essence naturally recovered could not match the speed at which the Moonlight Gu expelled primeval essence.\n\nBut for Fang Zheng, who had A-grade aptitude, he could replenish 0.8 tenths of primeval essence every hour. In six hours, he could recover 48% of his total primeval essence, whereas the Moonlight Gu could only expel 30% of it over the same six hours.\n\nHe did not even need external aid like primeval stones. He could simply keep refining, resting a few times in between, and after a few days, he would successfully refine the Moonlight Gu.\n\nTherefore, Fang Yuan knew from the very beginning that in this assessment of refining the Moonlight Gu, he had no chance whatsoever of taking first place. This had nothing to do with strength—aptitude was the primary determining factor here."
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
} |